Disappearing birds

19 posts / 0 new
Last post
Night Parrot
Night Parrot's picture
Disappearing birds

Don't know whether this will work or not..........

http://iview.abc.net.au/programs/abc-news-qld/NC1430Q313S00#playing

pacman
pacman's picture

It took me to the news - I assume that was not your intent

Peter

Night Parrot
Night Parrot's picture

Yes it was my intention pacman. I'm glad it works. See last item before the weather.

pacman
pacman's picture

good story, just 2 issues

I don't mind being called compulsive but object to 'a little strange'

why just Noisy Miner and not Common Mynah?

Peter

Woko
Woko's picture

A very good question, Peter. I saw this item as broadcast. It was rather shallow, I thought. When the ABC consults with people with expertise such as Dr David Paton in SA such news items are far more authentic. That said, at least the airing of the fact that Australia's woodland birds are fast disappearing was worthwhile. In this regard this is what I sent to the Pt Lincoln Council in SA today:

Hi there. I was astounded to learn that there's a shameful plan to replace valuable bushland near Pt Lincoln with a housing encroachment. It would be reassuring indeed if Council could confirm that this is not the case & that, in view of the environmental destruction occurring in so many places, all bushland in the Pt Lincoln Council area will be preserved. Could I suggest that Council protects its bushland & encourages private bushland owners to do likewise so that Pt Lincoln will be an attraction for bird watchers & other nature lovers. If there is a plan to destroy bushland could you please reply so that my wife & I can, regrettably, remove Pt Lincoln from our next trip to Eyre Peninsula.

Night Parrot
Night Parrot's picture

Yes it was very shallow Woko; I suspect it was a short fill-in. But as you indicated, any airtime on the subject is a plus. Of course the development at Port Lincoln is just an example of what is happening everywhere. Maybe you could also write to the SA ministers responsible for planning, environment and tourism. Councils only seem to be interested in development at any cost, unless there are enough councillors with a leftist leaning to have an impact. Ratepayers everywhere, in their own self interest, should vote for the most rabid greenies at their council elections. Leafiness brings health and wealth to ratepayers; whereas development only benefits the vested few and never, it seems, enhances the environment or the quality of life. 

Woko
Woko's picture

Hi Night Parrot. I fully support your contention that "leafiness" brings health & wealth to ratepayers. However, I don't know that a council or government has to be "leftist leaning" to have a positive environmental impact. In fact, there's a good argument that a government which conserves the environment is, in fact, conservative by definition. Further, governments which are environmentally destructive (& aren't there heaps of those around?) are totally radical. After all, what could be more radical than being hell-bent on destroying a planet? So those governments which label themselves as conservative & yet adopt horribly anti-environment policies & practices are telling what  is probably the biggest lie of all.

Wollemi
Wollemi's picture

Sadly, subdivision and increased housing equals more rates, and that is all some councils seem to care about.

Until the federal government imposes upon the states and local councils a defined percentage of land that must be kept as bushland with no exceptions, rather than a 'green space' percentage afterall the local football field can be counted as green space but it is not exactly habitat rich.

And when councils stop handing out permits to cut down trees on the basis that a branch might fall and hurt someone things will start getting better. Afterall during a strong wind a tile might come adrift from a roof and hit someone and kill them but they dont get rid of all tiled roofs.

I guess what we can do is to keep on planting what we can when we can and hope for the best. It is afterall at least something, which is always better than nothing.

Woko
Woko's picture

Yes. Keep on keeping on, Wollemi.

As well as planting it's important to regenerate. If you have a local bush regeneration/restoration group then it might be worthwhile joining. What can be learned & achieved can be mind blowing!

I'd go one step further from a defined percentage to be kept as bushland. Why not consider the habitat needs of the wildlife & then restore what's needed to sustain wildlife populations? That should see huge amounts of land rehabilitated.

Wollemi
Wollemi's picture

Agreed Woko!

I have responsibilities at home at the moment that prevent me from doing regen work, but have when I can been involved at the council's provenance nursery. Hoping to that more regularly in the new year.

Woko
Woko's picture

Sometimes regeneration can be achieved by doing absolutely nothing except putting away the mower & spray kit  or removing the stock from near remnant native vegetation. Yesterday I was at my local Mitre10 where, growing from between the bricks in a car park divider, was a stand of Austrodanthonia, one of the native grasses. The seeds may have been transported by wind or the grille of my car on a previous visit. From such little things big things can grow.

pacman
pacman's picture

Woko wrote:

If there is a plan to destroy bushland could you please reply so that my wife & I can, regrettably, remove Pt Lincoln from our next trip to Eyre Peninsula.

that is good

Peter

Wollemi
Wollemi's picture

Woko,

yes as time goes on we are finding that just not mowing areas lets the natural bush reclaim its own! Though the area that was couch and kikuya is a bit harder to regen. The couch grass seems to choke out anything and everything. Any suggestions?

Woko
Woko's picture

Those two grasses are real pests because they grow from stolons. They both have their growth spurts in late spring to early summer so that's a good time to spray. Before spraying it's a good idea to water the grasses so that there's plenty of juice to transport the herbicide. I use Roundup. There are others. Because of the persistence of these grasses it's important to do follow up spraying. This might need to be done a number of times. 

Before spraying it's important to check for any native plants that might be growing among the weeds. Any native plants can be protected using a piece of board. 

Where first to spray is also important. Start near good quality bush or native vegetation so that any seeds from the native vegetation will fall close by into soil where Kikuyu & Couch have died. So gradually spray out from the good quality bush. It might take a number of years for the bush to extend into the sprayed areas.

The optimum time to mow introduced grasses is before seed matures in spring so that you minimise the amount of feral seed which is in the ground ready to germinate next year. You may well be doing this already. Using this strategy I now have considerable areas of native grasses, mosses &, I think, lichens. Not only does this benefit native critters such as some butterflies & birds which depend on native grasses it also benefits Ms Woko & me as the fire hazard is reduced. Also, I don't have to do as much mowing these days. And when I do mow I collect the native grass seeds so that I can broadcast them into areas where I've sprayed weeds. I've even begun broadcasting seeds onto the road verge so that, in the long term, the risk of fire from cigarette butt-flicking drivers will be reduced. 

Night Parrot
Night Parrot's picture

That's good advice from Woko. One has to be very vigilant. I've seen it take over a garden completely.

Spraying close to desired shrubs, especially if there is a breeze about, needs to be done carefully. If the desired shrubs will take to pruning, since the Roundup or Zero (glyphosate) kills through the leaves, you can cut them right back and put plastic bags over them before going crazy with the spray.

Woko
Woko's picture

That's a good idea, Night Parrot. Most native shrubs seem to enjoy a prune so it's a win-win as they say in corporatese. 

Wollemi
Wollemi's picture

Woko and Night Parrot,

thank you both for your sage advice!

I shall follow these suggestions and hopefully get a grip on these grass-monsters. They are a real pest.

dwatsonbb
dwatsonbb's picture

I use a product called "Ripper" it is also Glyphosate, comes in  stronger concentrate, and locally is cheaper than Roundup (last purchase was @ $140 for 20 litres, 480grams/litre at a rural supply store, not the local hardware or nursery, which usually only sell roundup in 1 or 2 litre concentrate at @ $60/litre). I usually divide product and therefore cost with other people, decant into 5 litre bottles, which lasts me about 3 years.  

Also mix it with a white oil which assists the spray in clinging to the leaf of the pest species. A friend uses a few drops of dishwashing detergent for the same purpose. You can also mix in some food dye so it is obvious where you have already sprayed. A bit of practice to work the right amount of dye out though, not enough and you will have wasted your effort.

Dale Huonville, Tasmania

Night Parrot
Night Parrot's picture

The dye is a good idea Dale. Councils and commercial sprayers use a dye. It would be interesting to know what it is.

Yes glyphosate is a lot cheaper in concentrate form. Even Coles and Bunnings sell concentrate.

 and   @birdsinbackyards
                 Subscribe to me on YouTube