While nothing new here at least there has been a national forum to discuss the issue. Hopefully something will finally happen. http://www.upstart.net.au/2015/04/27/new-plan-to-control-feral-cats/
Term and Conditions | Privacy Statement | Web Support by Gaia Resources Hosted by Serversaurus |
Cats should be banmed from sale altogether, cats are killers whether desexed or not. If you can't do without a pet there are better pets available for you then cats. Birds of many sizes and colours are available that are totally tame and far easier to care for and much more interesting and intelligent then cats. I say a big NO to cats in Australia and I don't care what the multi billion dollar pet industry thinks.
For Australian birds, natives=life, exotics=death, so do them a favour and go plant some natives and save their lives.
I agree, but how do we control the population that "loves cats"?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sP4NMoJcFd4
;-)
soakes
Olinda, Victoria, Australia
Yes keeping birds in cages is the way to go. What a load of cod's wallop!
I have four cats, all indoor 100% of the time. I cannot see anything wrong with that.
Better start culling the irresponsible pet owners first. Would be a far better solution.
Can we please NOT turn this into another cat haters vs. cat owners war. We all know pet owners regardless of species need to be responsible. Let's concentrate on the issue of feral cats for now.
Dale Huonville, Tasmania
Yes, any progress made on the feral cat situation is a good thing. An interesting article dwatsonbb. Disturbing how cats can spread toxoplasmosis to native animals.
birds make much better pets than cats.
I've seen enough bird escapees to indicate that there's no foolproof way of keeping introduced birds out of the native population - at least where I live. Besides, it's interesting to reflect on why someone would want to keep an animal in a cage. I've often wondered if it's a need for control.
And don't forget the old saying: "A bird in the wild is worth a million in the cage."
It sounds like the best solution is to only have native animals (whether birds or not) as pets :)
soakes
Olinda, Victoria, Australia
captive breeding is the only reason we have many bird species with us today, i'd rather see them thriving and proliferating in captivity (in massive planted enclosures simulating their natural habitat and diet as closely as possible) than in a museum or book.
i'd rather still see them in the wild but us humans have in many cases rendered this impossible
I have no problems with eradicating feral cats as long as it is done as humanely as possible.
With regards to irresponsible pet ownership, that is much harder to control unfortunately. In my opinion, people should really have a licence to own any kind of a pet (or bear children), including dogs or cats and should all pass an intelligence test to obtain the said licence.
What I don't get is the need to keep birds in captivity with the exception of endangered or extinct (in the wild) bird species. I am sure many people do not have the space requirements to keep the birds' lives enriched enough by having them ample flying space. I'd hate to be a pet bird, generally speaking.
i'd hate to be a pet cat confined to a house all day.
i'd rather be a finch in a huge densely planted outdoor aviary in the sun
why do we need to keep anything in captivity?
heaps of people don't take care of their pets, irrespective of pet species. i've seen some terrible conditions across the board. i don't see why bird keepers should be condemned anymoreso than dog, cat etc keepers.
Many bird species are doing better in private captivity than in the wild.. what the aust government considers protection plus the efforts of official conservation organisations. There are more Swift Parrots in Europe (they breed them like budgies) than in the wild and in captivity in australian aviculture... there might not be any in the wild in 15 years.
...Gouldian Finches, Princess Parrots, Black-throated Finches.. Spix's Macaw wouldn't be with us..
Some years ago I was sitting in my yard talking with a friend's teenage sun when a cluster of rainbow Lorikeets decended on a nearby tree. I pointed the birds out to him and his response was. "If you like them I could catch some for you to keep!"
I just said, "No need to catch them, they choose to visit me often and I get to see their beauty, when they visit."
He just thought about that for a minute and said. "Oh yeah! You don't need them in a cage if they keep coming back"
Sometimes attitudes will change with just a bit of education.
As for cats, I do not have any as pets, I choose not to have any because I would not want to limit them to indoors and I can't afford a big enough enclosure for them to be outdoors. I have known many very happy indoor cats that love their home environment and I think that some solid education and some changes in law are indeed required to help the problem of feral cats.
When I lived in far north Queensland 35 years ago I did shoot feral cats. I can assure you that those cats were nothing like the household moggy curled up on the lap of its owner. The cats I shot were huge. I wish I had a camera back then and could have taken photos because no one would believe how big those cats were. Several generations of living in the bush makes for a bigger, leaner, meaner, and more cunning hunter than anything seen in closer to the suburbs.
Happy Birding!
https://www.flickr.com/photos/138588528@N02/
Too right Dale. There seems to have been some fair and sensible discussion at that forum, let's hope some of it can actually be supported & implemented.
What possible natural behaviours can be taken away from confining an animal (cat) that has been domesticated for (apparently) over 5000 years?? Cats couldn't care if they're confined inside or to a run as long as they're well cared for, stimulated and have sufficient company. Caged birds purely for an individual to enjoy as a pet, I don't see a comparison there - how many of their natural behaviours aren't stymied when caged - flying higher than a few metres and further than the same for a start. Rehab birds unsuitable for re-release and controlled breeding for release and repopulation, well that is entirely different naturally.
It's my opinion that somewhere along the line a vast amount of people have managed to turn it all backwards - it seems acceptible to some to allow our domestic friends to run free (dogs unchecked on beaches included), but let's not batt an eyelid at the thought of confining our wildlife with fences for their protection etc. All cock-eyed & arse-about if you ask me.
West Coast Tasmania
I go along with Annie W's comment about confines stymying natural behaviours. It certainly happens to birds. Extremely so in Asia where birds are kept in cages with about the same internal space as a shoe-box. And I guess Annie is right about cats being adaptable to confines. (Amazing how quickly they can shuffle off millenia of domestication when let loose in the bush).
And yes confining wildlife has its problems. Which is why I think its so important to have long natural corridors along rivers, watercourses, etc. Instead, farming and development is too often allowed to take over these corridors.
And of course there are degrees of confinement. The Australian Wildlife Conservancy has three million hectares under management to protect natives from ferals. On only the first stage of one of its recent projects, AWC erected 42 kilometers of feral free fencing. Without efforts like this, our natve fauna will be fighting a losing battle against the feral cat. It is such an efficient killer.
can you really know how the cat feels
as for domestication...
domestic cats can revert to wild semi-feral strays in a few weeks at liberty
and to ferals within a couple of generations
as capable hunters as their counterparts roaming the african plains
any 'possible natural behaviours' killing things? what they love to do? ever seen a cat play with its prey
practically any domestic kitty is a master hunter
just think, after 5000 years of domestication it's capable of successfully hunting a wild rat that's been evolving via natural selection over the same period, it's quite remarkable.
There is no reason any domestic bird can't be as well maintained as a cat or better. birds kept in adequate space can be very strong flyers... some breeders have to set traps in aviaries as you'd have no hope of catching the inhabitants by handnet
Would you prefer to visit our wildlife in museums?
I'm not a fan of domestic cats but my wife has a ginger cat which is ex-feral. It domesticated itself and loves spending time inside, there really isn't any difference between feral and domestic cats. A feral cat is much less likely to kill birds than a domestic cat outdoors, just because of the energy balance equation involved.
I can't see the point of birds in cages, or any other wild animals. Unlike domestic/feral cats they aren't adapted to the confinement and suffer from stress. There are some animals like cunningham's skinks which are adapted to confined spaces, even these I can't see the point of keeping them confined, much better to make your environment a haven for wildlife so you can get all the enjoyment without responsibility for their care. I even have cunningham's skinks living in my ceiling space.
heaps of birds are domesticated
in fact some 'species' like the Bengalese Mannikin (a domesticated hybrid that's been bred in captivity in small cages for centuries in asia) and canaries may actually breed better in smaller more controlled and confined artificial surroundings (though even still i would prefer if they were given as much room and natural settings as possible) though they are fully domesticated and would be incapable of surviving in the wild.
Fair question zosterops. Although, as you said, "i'd hate to be a pet cat confined to a house all day. i'd rather be a finch in a huge densely planted outdoor aviary in the sun". So....how would you claim to really know how the cat (or finch) feels either?
My perspective on birds in cages is purely a personal one based on my knowledge of their natural tendencies, my perspective on cats is the same but also heavily based on personal experience. I would hazard a guess that you perhaps have never even owned a cat?
I'm certainly no expert in animal behaviour, so perhaps next time I spy one of our many safe and healthy cats, inside (& upside down) purring on a bed, basking lazily on the windowsill, or outside in their 80sqm of enclosure playing stalk with another cat or poor unsuspecting cricket in the jungle end of their run, climbing their Cherry Plum Tree or scratching at their jungle of Man Ferns, I shall endeavour to clarify if they are as "happy" as I perceive them to be, compared to a free to roam type cat who has to additionally dodge traffic, stray dogs & neighbourhood brawls - resulting in the spread of toxo plus many other diseases & injuries etc.
I think the belief that confining cats indoors is cruel or unnatural is wrong - unintentionally it could actually be a sadly quick way to discourage anyone with a roaming kitty from even considering the proven benefits of confinement.
Absolutely, domestic cats have hunting instincts comparible to their wild ancestors, similarly dogs do to theirs - but neither are wild animals anymore. We confine our dogs, or should, we should also confine our cats imo as you are spot on, any domestic animal will very quickly and lethally adapt to feral existence if it HAS to.
Leading into Little Penguin breeding season, I've spent the last two months setting a cat trap twice daily in one of our penguin rookeries, and monitor another 120+ burrows in my zone alone for various things, all in my own time. One part of monitoring is to check for traces of predator tracks, scats or scent, so I'm more than aware of the impact of feral species first hand, and the absolute need to prevent the problem and/or eliminate them humanely.
I disagree: "killing things" is not a specific behaviour, it's a result. Hunt/stalk and catch are natural behaviours, triggered by basic survival instincts - including training/honing of them, or apparent "play". Killing and consumption (not always consumption though with pets) being the end result. Remove a cat's access to live prey by confining it and they are quite happy to fullfill the stalk/hunt and catch part of their natural behaviour with other cats, people, toys etc, then come inside to consume their human provided "kill" from Woolies.
I think you have misinterpreted my point zosterops, because that IS my point - If we continue to place our domestic pets' (and our) needs above those of our wildlife, instead of the other way around, then that is all we will be left with, taxidermied exhibits in museums.
West Coast Tasmania
Is a bird domesticated just because it has been bred to survive in a cage for many generations? It is a complicated question. Undoubtedly chooks and other fowl have been domesticated, but is a budgie? Tigers breed quite well in captivity but you wouldn't call them domesticated.
There isn't any difference between domesticated and feral cats, a feral cat is just a cat that survives in the wild without being fed by humans. There isn't any process of going feral over a few generations, as soon as it is living wild and catching it's own food it is a feral. Some ferals are quite large but I have seen some that are very small, being small can be an advantage if there is limited food. I think it is largely a myth about feral populations getting huge over time. It may happen sometimes but generally they stay the same size as domesticated cats.
Absolutely. the same goes for zebra finches.
would you consider avicultural hybrids that do not exist in the wild domesticated? how many thousands of generation of living with man do you require? is a feather duster budgie domesticated? these monstrosities akin to fancy goldfish...
With a name like that, there's a good chance a feather duster budgie would be domesticated. Anyway I had never heard of one before and so I googled it. Indeed it is a monstrosity. Its a case of gilding the lily. One just can't improve on the green budgie of the wild.
Wild-type budgies are very rare in captivity (note almost all green birds kept are anything but wild-type) and they've recently been referred to as 'shell parrots' to distinguish them from the thousands of domestic swarms.
I didn't say that at all and think it's a case by case basis. I don't fancy the chances of a feather-duster budgie adapting to the wild. I suspect the inability to fly or walk effectively may well prove a hindrance.
actually I reckon i was downplaying the inherent potential of wildness in 'domestic' cats.
as greg says the line is very thin indeed.
So presumably you would consider a white tiger to be domesticated.
I don't think inability to survive in the wild is the only criterion for domestication. Many domestic animals survive in the wild quite well, eg goats and camels.
Most aviary birds like budgies and zebra finches, I wouldn't call that domestication, I would just call it a captive-bred population. Domestication implies some modification of the animal's natural behaviour. The only modification to these birds behaviour is that they have been confined. Just because they have been bred with deformities doesn't make them domesticated.
Actually, my entire comment was, "We confine our dogs, or should, we should also confine our cats imo as you are spot on, any domestic animal will very quickly and lethally adapt to feral existence if it HAS to."
My reply was in response to your comment, "as for domestication...domestic cats can revert to wild semi-feral strays in a few weeks at liberty and to ferals within a couple of generations....."
Apologies for the confusion zosterops. Perhaps my comment could have been expanded to: "We confine our dogs, or should, we should also confine our cats imo as you are spot on, although this is not just relevant to cats, as any domestic animal will very quickly and lethally adapt to feral existence if it HAS to". Any domestic animal allowed to become feral brings it's own set of negative problems to the natural balance of the environment.
You summed it up beautifully GregL, once a cat is in the wild and those eat to survive instincts kick in....one thing all species do have in common I guess if left unchecked. I too have seen a mix of small and large ferals. I imagine feral cat size could well be area specific, dependent on whether or not they are the apex predator in their location. Meaning, a Bird of Prey for example, wouldn't think twice about a few kg's of feral kitty lunch, but may well pass over Mr 8+kg feral Tom cat, leaving him to pass on his size genes to future feral generations. I don't know, just musing .
I hadn't heard of Feather Duster Budgies either. Apparently a super rare mutation due to a recessive gene and possibly from generations of inbreeding, also known as feather duster syndrome which is fatal. Poor little mites, most only have a very difficult and very short life span of less than a year. Only a handful of reported cases wordlwide of the accidental breeding of them. Lets hope no-one ever tries to do it deliberately - wishful thinking?
Getting back to the orginal topic, I sincerely hope the plans from this recent national feral cat control forum, receive all the support required to implement them. I can only imagine it's perhaps not just an appropriate solution that is the larger problem given all the educated minds assisting to resolve the situation, but the enforcing and support structure for monitoring etc that would follow.
West Coast Tasmania
i'd consider them domesticated on the simple grounds that they are far removed from wild ancestors and have been developed into hundreds of different plumage mutations and could not survive in the wild.
actually i reckon wild zebra finches sound a bit different to domestics. the size of both species has also been modified (some breeds are a bit bigger as well as obvious plumage differences). they definitely behave differently in some respects. in the wild zebra finches are strictly monogamous and mate for life, in captivity they often swap partners freely. in the wild they often take insects, in captivity mine didn't take insects when provided with them, probably because they've been bred for so many generations without this food source. they lay larger clutches in captivity. in the wild they breed when rains come, in captivity they breed continuously (due to water presence duping them into thinking it's constantly good seasons, same as budgies). zebra finches will nest on the ground with no nesting material in captivity, i think captive birds also perform a less elaborate courtship display.
in any case they are far removed from their wild ancestors.. i wouldn't call it a captive-bred population of the wild species there's clearly some differences. I don't know about a wild-type captive zebra finch population as depending on how many generations it's been they will probably exhibit some differences to wild birds
budgies can be taught to talk and form close bonds with their owners..
Maybe the Bengalese Mannikin Lonchura domestica (note name) is a better example as it is of interspecies hybrid origin. Here we can't really compare the behaviour of wild/captive as they are no wild birds... an interesting side effect of the domestication (for lack of a better word) is the tolerance of nest inspection, generally well-tolerated by the most intensively bred species yet which is certain nest abandonment in less common species).
Canaries' Binomial name is Serinus canaria forma domestica. Domestics have a very different song to wild birds due to selective breeding (figures). reddish canaries were also produced by extensive hybridisation with the Red Siskin (incidentally the latter was driven to the brink of extinction by collectors for the purposes of hybridisation, yet ironically only survives today thanks to aviculture).
it's interesting though, there doesn't seem to be any accepted definition of domestication other than taming/habituating to human presence... i suppose zoo animals or even a wild rehabilitated raptor in falconry could be considered domesticated by some definitions (i wouldn't... but what about a several generation hybrid falcon breed -some are fertile- that could not occur in the wild) though bred falcons certainly behaves differently to a wild bird, they are trained not to kill though i believe they can adapt well to the wild and even mate with wild birds
Didn't stop those bubble-eye goldfish... and other piscicultural abominations and hybrid mutations such as balloon mollies, blood parrot cichlids, flowerhorn cichlids,
If you're interested I found videos on YouTube by the Finch Society of Australia and all the great work breeders are doing these days to conserve our birds and protect the wild populations for the future. Also there are numerous videos of tame birds enjoying free flight outside their cage or the house and returning to their owner just like racing pigeons do. Cats just can't compete with birds as pets.
For Australian birds, natives=life, exotics=death, so do them a favour and go plant some natives and save their lives.
I hope that the Finch Society of Australia is working hard to protect & restore habitat for those finches it's breeding for the future.