Thanks Canonguy. I have been informed the location I found this owl was right where a dead powerful owl was found just over a week ago. Appeared a dog got to it (after death) so was not a lot left making sex determination difficult. So good chance this is the partner.
In general terms, since now is when they are most sensitive to disturbance (starting about late May when they're preparing to lay eggs), it is best not to use flash to photograph them, as that could disturb the owls beyond what would be considered an acceptable level. Usually, once a pair has chicks in the hollow then it's thought to be "safe" to take photos with flash.
Naturally, with single owls, that may not be the case, but I'd be very careful until about spring, especially if you are still new to owls.
Another thing I was recently made aware of by an owl researcher friend is that despite what folks say or think (I also used to after having read about it before), using red filters or red lights will not make it less disturbing for the owls as a plain white light. In my friend's words, a soft, white light, shone a little bit at a time is far less disturbing. It has something to do with the cones in owls' eyes and how they receive different wavelengths of light. With them apparently being more sensitive to the red spectrum than thought before.
But, he said, the red light/filter is good for nocturnal mammals.
Chris is running workshops on July 25/26 which I will attend, in the meantime I observe, report and follow advice on observing. These owls are in close proximity to people, one in particular often roosts very low, directly above a walking track.
Yes, he said that when I saw him Saturday morning. Later in the day I heard trilling for the first time so now looking forward to seeing chicks. (Chris has explained how cautious we need to be now)
Excellent photos
Nice
Ryu
Canberra
Aiming for DSLR-quality shots with a bridge camera
Is this one female?
Thanks for comments Whistling Duck and HelloBirdy.
I don't know. I have been observing Powerful Owls for a couple of months, that's my total experience.
I should hear soon from those "in the know", hopefully will be able to observe this owl some more (including recording it's calls)
Dave
Sydney
https://www.flickr.com/photos/12185187@N00/
They're normally not very vocal now.
If you can record the calls it can be usually easy to tell male from female. But not always the
Thanks Canonguy. I have been informed the location I found this owl was right where a dead powerful owl was found just over a week ago. Appeared a dog got to it (after death) so was not a lot left making sex determination difficult. So good chance this is the partner.
Dave
Sydney
https://www.flickr.com/photos/12185187@N00/
In general terms, since now is when they are most sensitive to disturbance (starting about late May when they're preparing to lay eggs), it is best not to use flash to photograph them, as that could disturb the owls beyond what would be considered an acceptable level. Usually, once a pair has chicks in the hollow then it's thought to be "safe" to take photos with flash.
Naturally, with single owls, that may not be the case, but I'd be very careful until about spring, especially if you are still new to owls.
Another thing I was recently made aware of by an owl researcher friend is that despite what folks say or think (I also used to after having read about it before), using red filters or red lights will not make it less disturbing for the owls as a plain white light. In my friend's words, a soft, white light, shone a little bit at a time is far less disturbing. It has something to do with the cones in owls' eyes and how they receive different wavelengths of light. With them apparently being more sensitive to the red spectrum than thought before.
But, he said, the red light/filter is good for nocturnal mammals.
Thanks Canonguy. I do log my activity and communicate to a group which includes an owl researcher and I take their advice seriously.
Non flash owl photos can be good too.
[url=https://flic.kr/p/vR57dT]
Dave
Sydney
https://www.flickr.com/photos/12185187@N00/
dmp, How did you avoid a Red-eye in the first two photographs?
Samford Valley Qld.
Reflex, Photoshop. I select pupil, desaturate (ie convert to mono) then reduce levels.
Quick and dirty on 2nd pic, give away is the catchlight in the left eye, should be on the right of the pupil.
Before:
[url=https://flic.kr/p/v17hFq]
Dave
Sydney
https://www.flickr.com/photos/12185187@N00/
Thanks Dave I need to spend more time on Photoshop.
Samford Valley Qld.
You mean the Powerful Owl Project?
Indirectly; the owl researcher is Chris Lloyd who communicates with David Bain. (As per comments from Chris in the bottom of this thread): http://www.birdsinbackyards.net/forum/Another-Powerful-Owl-couple
Chris is running workshops on July 25/26 which I will attend, in the meantime I observe, report and follow advice on observing. These owls are in close proximity to people, one in particular often roosts very low, directly above a walking track.
Dave
Sydney
https://www.flickr.com/photos/12185187@N00/
Chris is a good mate of mine.
Yes, he said that when I saw him Saturday morning. Later in the day I heard trilling for the first time so now looking forward to seeing chicks. (Chris has explained how cautious we need to be now)
Dave
Sydney
https://www.flickr.com/photos/12185187@N00/